Published May 24th in SEO by Dan Virgillito

Wikipedia is an interesting case when it comes to SEO. On the one hand, they’re an incredibly massive, high profile site full of authority. They have authority in a web sense, and authority in a factual sense. They’ve become a dominant informational source in dozens of languages around the world, despite being able to be edited by anyone with an account.
While you might think that makes it an excellent source for backlinks to rank a site, you might be wrong. The last bit there, the part where anyone at all can edit a Wikipedia article, makes it a problem for someone like Google. If they want to count links on Wikipedia as authoritative, they have to take into account the fact that anyone – including the owner of the site being linked to – can add the link to the page.
It does no good to count a link as a source of authority and a recommendation when the link is from the owner of the site being linked. That’s the same reason private blog networks are a bad idea, and why linking between several sites you own is considered bad practice.
It’s also a problem for Wikipedia. If you owned a site like Wiki, would you want anyone and their mother to be able to use you for lin…

Read our latest article
Many people, myself included, consider Google’s disavow tool to be a weapon of last resort. It’s the big gun you pull out when nothing else has worked. That’s not to say, however, that it should be treated lik…
If you’re not familiar with the world of internet marketing, and someone told you that you should use Screaming Frog, what would you think? I’d probably call them crazy. As it turns out, though, Screaming Frog is an…
The days of the oppressive force of Google Panda are over, but that doesn’t mean Panda has gone away. Quite the contrary; rather than the occasional Panda Update, Panda has been rolled into the main algorithm. It is consta…
CloudFlare is one of many CDNs available to webmasters today, and it has the ability to kick your search rankings up a notch. Used incorrectly, however, it can be detrimental just as easily. Rather than struggle to figure things…
Matt Cutts was, for a long time, essentially a rock star in the world of SEO. Not even one of the universally-beloved rock stars, either. He was more like one of those controversial rock stars, the ones a lot of people like as musici…
When we talk about social bookmarking sites, we think of the big names, like Digg, Reddit, and Delicious. The thing is, there way, way more than just these big names. Most of them aren’t as large, of course. They don’…
One of the best little beneficial changes you can make to your website, for the sake of user navigation and for Google ranking, is to implement breadcrumbs. And no, I’m not talking about eating a toasted sandwich over your…
There’s a bit of a pervasive myth in SEO that there are 200 factors that Google uses to determine search ranking. This is a very misleading claim, but it’s also a very clickbait-style headline. After all, that&rsqu…
Since 2011, Google has placed an ever-higher emphasis on the quality of the content on your site. It’s sort of a turning point in the quality versus quantity debate that raged for years. Before, you could rank a site quite w…
One of the marketing techniques we’ve mentioned on this blog before is the idea of infographic marketing. We’ve talked about using StumbleUpon to grow graphics, among other things. One aspect about marketing th…